Comparative study of two different computer-controlled local anesthesia injection systems in children: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare pain perception associated with two computer-controlled local anesthesia devices, the WAND™ STA (Milestone Scientific Inc., Livingston, NJ, USA) and the Calaject (Rønvig dental MFG, Daugaard, Denmark) in young children. METHODS: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial comprising 30 patients, aged 6-12 years, received randomly, in two separate sessions, a local anesthesia injection in the maxillary using either the wand STA or the Calaject. Pain perception was evaluated using the patient's heart rate, an 11-point numerical scale (NRS), and the Sound, Eye, and Motor (SEM) body movements. Statistical difference was set at p = 0.05. Repeated measures analysis of variance were conducted to compare the mean pulse for Calaject and STA at different times. It was followed by univariate analysis and Bonferroni multiple comparisons tests. Wilcoxon tests were performed to compare NRS, SEM, and injection duration between Calaject and STA. RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference between Calaject and STA in pulse rate before injection (p = 0.720), during injection (p = 0.767), and after injection (p = 0.757). The mean NRS score was significantly greater with STA in comparison with Calaject (p = 0.017). The mean SEM score was also significantly greater with STA in comparison with Calaject (p = 0.002). However, the mean duration was significantly longer with Calaject (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Calaject was more effective than STA in reducing pain perception associated with periapical injection in young children.

Metallic syringe versus electronically assisted injection system: a comparative clinical study in children.

AIM: Local anaesthesia injection necessary for pain control in paediatric dentistry may itself be painful sometimes, partly because of the pressure felt during injection; electronically assisted injection systems were developed to address this problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study design: The present study is a clinical study in children that compared two types of devices for paediatric buccal infiltration anaesthesia: the aspirating syringe and an electronically assisted injection system, the Wand STA. A split mouth, randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted on 30 healthy six to eight-year-old patients (6.64 ± 0.803 years) requiring pulpotomies on two symmetrical primary maxillary molars. Each patient received the following types of anaesthesia, in separate, consecutive, randomly ordered sessions: conventional buccal infiltration by metallic aspirating syringe and buccal infiltration by computer-controlled local anaesthetic device (Single Tooth Anesthesia). Parameters assessed were: pain experienced during injection, patient's heart rate and behaviour, anaesthesia quantity required and onset time. RESULTS: No statistical differences were observed between the two techniques (p? 0.05) for all assessed parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that computer-assisted anaesthesia may represent an alternative to conventional syringes for local buccal anaesthesia in paediatric dental treatment; comparison to other types of dental infiltration anaesthesia needs further investigation.